Who Has The Keys?
Access control is a major problem for businesses large and small.
Companies with high-tech access control systems - key cards,
fingerprint- or retina scanners, etc. - can easily reprogram access
codes and delete former employees from the data base. But even smaller
businesses that rely on the security provided by a good, traditional
lock-and-key system need to update their access controls regularly.
This is an issue whether you use padlocks, cylinder locks, or police
locks.
The first step is to conduct a regular Key Audit to review the status
and location of every key, making sure that no unauthorized person has
one. In small businesses with few employees, this can be a fairly
simple process and one that's sufficient to ensure access control.
If your company has more than a few employees, though, an audit might
not be enough. A former employee - especially a resentful fired one -
might still hold a key, inadvertently or deliberately. He might have
"lost it," or have made a duplicate before returning it.
Some businesses protect against unauthorized duplication by having
every key stamped "Do not duplicate;" reputable locksmiths will refuse
to make an unauthorized copy. Unfortunately, there are key cutters who
will ignore that stamp, and others (especially at high-volume big-box
stores) don't have time to (or simply don't) pay attention to such
strictures.
Some keys are harder to copy than others. Medeco keys are impossible to
duplicate except by licensed Medeco dealers, and then only with the
permission of the registered owner. That protection eliminates the
possibility of someone copying a key before returning it on request.
But even Medeco locks are vulnerable to the former employee who "lost"
his key and therefore can't turn it in.
The safest way to ensure that only authorized people have keys is by
repinning locks from time to time, so that old keys no longer work.
After all, it's not only disgruntled people who hold on to keys. At one
point, I had keys to three small businesses where I'd once worked, and
where I was still friendly with the owners. Keeping the keys was not
for dishonest reasons, just rather dishonorable ones: it was convenient
when I was in the neighborhood to be able to go in, even when they were
closed, to use the bathroom or make a quick phone call (this was before
cell phones). One of those keys still worked five years after I'd left!
If you haven't conducted a Key Audit recently, do so. And if there's
any possibility that a former employee (or maybe a current employee's
disgruntled ex-) or even someone like me, has an unauthorized key, you
need to call to have the locks changed. The cost of repinning and
replacing a few keys - or even a large number of them - is far less
than the loss you could face as a result of unauthorized access.
All the above holds true for residences, too. Think of all the people
who have had keys to your apartment over the years - the super (or a
series of them), a maid or cleaning service, caterers, the landlord, a
neighbor who's moved away, dog walkers, careless teenagers who lent
their key to their best friend . . . .
It's probably time to make a change - before you wish you had.
First published at: http://www.mr-locks.com/news.php?id=51
by Andrew Reed for Mr. Locks, Inc.
|